| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 3.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
CPU throttled at 31% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| System | Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D (all builds) |
| Motherboard | SAMSUNG NP900X3C-A05ID |
| Memory | 1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150715 |
| Uptime | 12.7 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 09 '17 at 04:05 |
| Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
| CPU Throttled | 31% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3517U
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg)
|
34.1%
Below average
|
29% 39.5 Pts
|
7% 51.8 Pts
|
3% 54 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Sanyo(144D C0D3) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
|
3.58%
Terrible
|
3% 4.14 fps
|
4% 4.71 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Elpida EBJ40UG8BFU0-GN-F 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
22.8%
Poor
|
23% 8 GB/s
|
15% 5.13 GB/s
|
31% 128 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D Builds (Compare 141 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Samsung 900X3C/900X3D/900X3E/900X4C/900X4D
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples | 42x |
| Core i7-3537UIntelBench 52%, 17,065 samples | 35x |
| Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples | 32x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples | 132x |
| HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 50% - Above average | Total price: $225 |