Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6820HK 20,362 User benchmarks, average bench 69% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 88.3 1-Core 105 2-Core 204 76% 133 Pts	4-Core 362 8-Core 566 57% 464 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile) 73,882 User benchmarks, average bench 72% Asus(1043 13F0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 382.53 Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Lighting 97.4 Reflection 115 Parallax 98.8 79% 104 fps	MRender 93.3 Gravity 92.2 Splatting 101 79% 95.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 82%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GB 500 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	82.1% Excellent	MC Read 28.6 MC Write 31.9 MC Mixed 26.6 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 26.5 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 69.2 58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 82.1% Great: 83%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 43%

Speed boat

CPU
Core i7-6820HKIntelBench 69%, 20,362 samples	224x
Core i7-6700HQIntelBench 59%, 320,434 samples	213x

GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples	437x

SSD
THNSN5256GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshibaBench 148%, 19,151 samples	92x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	77x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsung $31Bench 183%, 9,202 samples	39x

RAM
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 1x16GBSamsungBench 41%, 18,452 samples	146x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 2x16GBSamsungBench 76%, 4,237 samples	122x
M471A2K43BB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 79%, 500 samples	44x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16