Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 32% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF (all builds)
Memory	20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140318
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '17 at 15:25
Run Duration	235 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4771-$129 11,180 User benchmarks, average bench 73% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 194 75% 128 Pts	4-Core 262 8-Core 459 44% 360 Pts	64-Core 560 35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% EVGA(3842 1784) 3GB CLim: 1320 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (76^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.8% Average	Lighting 54.8 Reflection 46.3 Parallax 58.3 45% 53.1 fps	MRender 67.5 Gravity 63.6 Splatting 49 48% 60 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmedia AS2115 256GB 32 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 124GB free Firmware: 0 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	30.2% Below average	Read 255 Write 34.2 Mixed 51.6 24% 114 MB/s	4K Read 16.7 4K Write 34.7 4K Mixed 6.91 52% 19.5 MB/s	DQ Read 89 DQ Write 37.9 DQ Mixed 15.3 24% 47.4 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 67%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22255 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 216 (B1) Unknown 96 96 129 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 68 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 58 (F1) Unknown 99 99 21393317786
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 170 166 6466 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 234 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 22310 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 47 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 186 (C2) HDA temperature 123 114 27 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	86.6% Excellent	Read 155 Write 148 Mixed 144 112% 149 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.69 4K Mixed 0.15 33% 0.31 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 112%
Hitachi HTS 721010A9E630 1TB 1,664 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 584GB free Firmware: JB0O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 145 145 103079215106 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 31 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 68 68 14369 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 27 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 6 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 9424 (C2) HDA temperature 146 146 193274708009 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 219 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0	60.6% Good	Read 104 Write 108 Mixed 105 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.007 4K Write 0.44 4K Mixed 0.08 17% 0.18 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 76%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB 5,910 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	71.7% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 27.9 MC Mixed 23.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 19.2 SC Mixed 19.7 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 61.1 66% 61.1 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF Builds (Compare 521 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 60%

Destroyer

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z87X-UD4H-CF

CPU
Core i7-4770KIntel $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples	236x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	107x
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	51x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	28x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples	20x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $332

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16