Asus P5QC

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 15% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus P5QC (all builds)
Memory	6.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20090427
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 08 '17 at 12:27
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5460-$190 10,360 User benchmarks, average bench 52% LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 54.7 2-Core 110 55% 84.8 Pts	4-Core 219 8-Core 220 29% 219 Pts	64-Core 218 14% 218 Pts
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7870-$203 42,130 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Sapphire(174B E217) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	28.3% Poor	Lighting 35.8 Reflection 32.2 Parallax 47.4 29% 38.5 fps	MRender 28.2 Gravity 29.8 Splatting 36.9 26% 31.6 fps
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV300S37A120G 120GB 4,336 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM11.K Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1222 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 911 (A8) Unknown 100 100 10 (AA) Unknown 100 100 131 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1376304 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 3145749 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 390 (C2) HDA temperature 66 55 193274970146 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 5 (DA) Unknown 100 100 5 (E7) Temperature 100 100 98 (E9) Unknown 100 100 2521 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3153 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5777 (F4) Unknown 100 100 21 (F5) Unknown 100 100 48 (F6) Unknown 100 100 728528	42.4% Average	Read 222 Write 167 Mixed 114 37% 168 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 11.8 72% 27 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 79.2 DQ Mixed 14.3 22% 40.5 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 83%
Seagate ST3120827AS 120GB-$38 1,818 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free Firmware: 3.42 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 52 46 100078392 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4596 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 834972269 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23450 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 4037 (C2) HDA temperature 42 48 38654705706 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 52 45 100078392 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 2 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 4 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	28.7% Poor	Read 49.1 Write 50.8 Mixed 21.6 30% 40.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.15 4K Mixed 0.41 88% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.7% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.6% Poor	MC Read 10.9 MC Write 8.5 MC Mixed 8.6 27% 9.33 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8 SC Mixed 8.8 24% 8.53 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5QC Builds (Compare 125 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5QC

CPU
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples	37x
Core2 Quad Q9650Intel $170Bench 51%, 16,719 samples	12x
Core2 Quad Q9400Intel $170Bench 46%, 24,176 samples	10x

GPU
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	12x
Blue 250GBWD $90Bench 79%, 26,761 samples	5x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	5x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	40x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	36x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $189

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16