| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 5.26% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Run History
| Motherboard | Asrock H61M-DGS (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130927 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 07 '17 at 17:29 |
| Run Duration | 90 Seconds |
| Run User | VEN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
65.7%
Good
|
59% 94.7 Pts
|
35% 263 Pts
|
16% 261 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Asus(1043 83BE) 1GB
CLim: 1101 MHz, MLim: 1090 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
5.26%
Terrible
|
2% 8.26 fps
|
12% 14 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
847GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JC4B Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
|
57.3%
Above average
|
54% 74 MB/s
|
104% 0.86 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.2%
Above average
|
52% 18 GB/s
|
38% 13.3 GB/s
|
56% 71 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61M-DGS Builds (Compare 1,035 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H61M-DGS - $68
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 158x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 100x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 78x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 116x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 80x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 54x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $155 |