Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	32.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 07 '17 at 12:08
Run Duration	364 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	75.5% Very good	Memory 82.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 177 74% 126 Pts	4-Core 368 8-Core 734 65% 551 Pts	64-Core 991 61% 991 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 270X-$199 77,943 User benchmarks, average bench 27% PowerColor(148C 2340) 2GB CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.11.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.8% Below average	Lighting 41.7 Reflection 37.3 Parallax 54.4 34% 44.5 fps	MRender 32.6 Gravity 35 Splatting 41.9 30% 36.5 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 29%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Thnsf5512gpuk NVMe SED TOSHIBA 512GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 477GB free Firmware: 5KDA5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	Read 1,627 Write 977 Mixed 1,279 287% 1,295 MB/s	4K Read 34.2 4K Write 78.6 4K Mixed 50.4 158% 54.4 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 84.2 77% 118 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 173%
Thnsf5512gpuk NVMe SED TOSHIBA 512GB 196 User benchmarks, average bench 127% 471GB free Firmware: 5KDA5103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	162% Outstanding	Read 1,363 Write 912 Mixed 651 215% 975 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 77.5 4K Mixed 48.5 143% 50.7 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 132 DQ Mixed 75.6 77% 125 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 162% Great: 173%
Kingston SNVP325S2256GB 256GB 135 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 22GB free (System drive) Firmware: AGYA0202 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 97 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2428 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 863 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (A9) Unknown 100 100 1653855357824 (AA) Unknown 100 100 107383357538 (AD) Unknown 100 100 8602320948 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (C2) HDA temperature 69 51 210454708255 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	36.9% Below average	Read 201 Write 156 Mixed 174 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 15.7 4K Write 37.4 4K Mixed 12.4 60% 21.9 MB/s	DQ Read 22.1 DQ Write 49.5 DQ Mixed 10.9 15% 27.5 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 42%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 180 176 5975 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1182 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1023 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 864 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 80 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2141 (C2) HDA temperature 121 113 29 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	67.5% Good	Read 116 Write 119 Mixed 117 88% 117 MB/s	4K Read 0.87 4K Write 2.38 4K Mixed 0.28 112% 1.18 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 1.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 183 179 5808 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1168 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1123 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 875 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 90 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 2212 (C2) HDA temperature 122 114 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.7% Very good	Read 139 Write 110 Mixed 128 95% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.66 4K Write 2.05 4K Mixed 0.28 96% 1 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 88%
Lexar microSD RDR 64GB 510 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 60GB free, PID b051 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	5.81% Terrible	Read 5.91 Write 5.59 Mixed 5.49 7% 5.66 MB/s	4K Read 3.18 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.78 72% 1.65 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.81% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 43.4 MC Write 36.5 MC Mixed 33.6 108% 37.8 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 40.7 SC Mixed 27.1 87% 30.5 GB/s	Latency 76.1 53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)