Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 32% Sail boat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121101
Uptime	6.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 19:03
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	23%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319 147,533 User benchmarks, average bench 71% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 120 2-Core 226 84% 147 Pts	4-Core 394 8-Core 607 62% 501 Pts	64-Core 626 39% 626 Pts
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Asus(1043 8465) 2GB CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (62^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	34.3% Below average	Lighting 41.3 Reflection 37.8 Parallax 50 34% 43 fps	MRender 51.1 Gravity 47.8 Splatting 35.2 36% 44.7 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 34.3% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 58GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4488 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 767 (B1) Unknown 98 98 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 59 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 594 (F1) Unknown 99 99 29356001968	62% Good	Read 288 Write 197 Mixed 234 53% 240 MB/s	4K Read 29.3 4K Write 42.3 4K Mixed 30.4 106% 34 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 71.8 69% 109 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 134%
Seagate ST3250824AS 250GB-$148 4,794 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 233GB free Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 111 81 103293477 (03) Spinup time 98 98 0 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 6038 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 88 60 704129653 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 24772 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5337 (BB) vendor-specific 37 37 63 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 47 504561694 (C2) HDA temperature 30 53 47244640286 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 62 54 186659401 (C5) Current pending sector count 1 1 4294967285 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 1 1 4294967285 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 14 167 86	36.1% Below average	Read 66.3 Write 59.5 Mixed 63.6 48% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.63 4K Write 0.93 4K Mixed 0.4 88% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 37%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83 138,859 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 177GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1259 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 70 69 9146 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4931 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19041 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3281 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 2 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 61 167504576538 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 487 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5012	65.8% Good	Read 101 Write 128 Mixed 89.7 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.41 106% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 65.8% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 Elpida EBJ21UE8BDF0-DJ-F 8313 CL9-9-9 DDR3-1333 Samsung M378B5673FH0-CF8 12GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048, 4096, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	48.7% Average	MC Read 16.3 MC Write 16.6 MC Mixed 14.6 45% 15.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 18.7 SC Mixed 16.4 48% 16.6 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	444x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	357x
Core i7-2600Intel $194Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	199x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	117x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	103x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	95x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	46x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	38x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	34x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16