Asus G55VW

Performance Results


Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	64.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

System	Asus G55VW (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK G55VW
Memory	14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120510
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 18:04
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300 38,575 User benchmarks, average bench 62% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	63.8% Good	Memory 83.6 1-Core 64.1 2-Core 128 57% 92 Pts	4-Core 245 8-Core 316 36% 280 Pts	64-Core 319 20% 319 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 63.8% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660M 7,381 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Asus(1043 2117) 2GB CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 359.46 Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	7.94% Terrible	Lighting 9.13 Reflection 8.42 Parallax 10.2 7% 9.26 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 8.4 Splatting 12 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.94% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 212GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5411 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 746 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 67 47 33 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 71 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9742219076	64.4% Good	Read 497 Write 345 Mixed 349 88% 397 MB/s	4K Read 24.1 4K Write 30 4K Mixed 13.7 70% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 26.9 DQ Write 96.8 DQ Mixed 13.7 24% 45.8 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 118%
Kingston DataTraveler R3.0 USB 3.0 16GB-$15 505 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 11GB free, PID 168e Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 40.1 Write 27.9 Mixed 29.4 40% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 5.47 4K Write 0.36 4K Mixed 0.04 34% 1.96 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16KTF51264HZ-1G6M1 Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 16GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	54.1% Above average	MC Read 21.3 MC Write 19.8 MC Mixed 17.2 56% 19.4 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 11.6 SC Mixed 13.9 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical G55VW Builds (Compare 166 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 9%

Tree trunk

System: Asus G55VW

CPU
Core i7-3610QMIntel $300Bench 62%, 38,575 samples	90x
Core i7-3630QMIntel $420Bench 61%, 65,927 samples	73x
Core i5-3210MIntel $52Bench 48%, 79,744 samples	1x

GPU
GTX 660MNvidiaBench 7%, 7,381 samples	165x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	1x

SSD
U100 128GBSandiskBench 38%, 2,261 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	4x

RAM
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	34x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 3x4GBHynixBench 43%, 520 samples	9x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 53%, 1,421 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $300

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16