Asus H81M-C/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 66% Battle cruiser	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C/BR (all builds)
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140515
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 16:56
Run Duration	151 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430-$124 24,837 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 88.8 1-Core 91.7 2-Core 183 71% 121 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 346 45% 341 Pts	64-Core 351 22% 351 Pts
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 1231) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 266 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	2.43% Terrible	Lighting 3.13 Reflection 3.69 Parallax 3.38 3% 3.4 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 1.91 2% 2.75 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 57GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3G37R5 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 225 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 85 (64) Unknown 100 100 464448 (65) Unknown 100 100 52592 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 2 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 201 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 773 (B7) Unknown 100 100 1 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 39 100 188979871783 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 7 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 7 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 1219 (EA) Unknown 100 100 460 (F1) Unknown 100 100 715 (F2) Unknown 100 100 555 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 7	58.4% Above average	Read 463 Write 223 Mixed 240 68% 309 MB/s	4K Read 25.9 4K Write 27.8 4K Mixed 10.3 67% 21.3 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 86.3 DQ Mixed 30.7 56% 114 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 130GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 141 141 73 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896960693 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2170 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 6 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5397 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 993 (C0) Power-off retract count 92 92 10319 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 92 92 10319 (C2) HDA temperature 142 142 206159740970 (C4) Reallocation count 72 72 113 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 985	56.5% Above average	Read 93.5 Write 103 Mixed 127 82% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.19 66% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 103%
Seagate ST3750640NS 750GB-$38 10,520 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 15GB free Firmware: 3.AEH Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 82 41374613 (03) Spinup time 94 93 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4448 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 513883905 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 27758 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2411 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 40 807796784 (C2) HDA temperature 48 60 90194313264 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 64 46 136799027 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	26.8% Poor	Read 46.9 Write 46.5 Mixed 50.9 36% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 0.82 4K Mixed 0.29 65% 0.51 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 26.8% Great: 42%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5401-011.A00LF 2x8GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	MC Read 17 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.6 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 68.7 58% 68.7 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C/BR Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C/BR

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	55x
Core i3-4170Intel $59Bench 57%, 48,178 samples	35x
Core i3-4160Intel $79Bench 55%, 48,506 samples	26x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	29x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	28x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	25x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	29x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	20x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	8x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	7x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $156

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16