Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 14% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom Z3735F 6,544 User benchmarks, average bench 34% þhá¢Ù#SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	30% Below average	Memory 55 1-Core 10.6 2-Core 15 22% 26.9 Pts	4-Core 31.5 8-Core 36.8 4% 34.2 Pts	64-Core 35.2 2% 35.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 30% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(1027 2014) 1GB Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.68% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.78 0% 0.79 fps	MRender 1.48 Gravity 0.63 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.15 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.68% Great: 1%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk DF4032 31GB 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0.1 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	19.8% Very poor	Read 170 Write 95.2 Mixed 112 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 8.87 4K Mixed 3.78 21% 6.75 MB/s	DQ Read 29.5 DQ Write 16.5 DQ Mixed 4.45 8% 16.8 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
MKF_SMBIOS_TYPE17_MANUFACTURER MKF_SMBIOS_TYPE17_ 1x2GB 120 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	11% Very poor	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.63 GB/s	SC Read 0.5 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 0.5 4% 1.47 GB/s	Latency 143 28% 143 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 21%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 33%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 36%, 507 samples	23x
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	22x
Celeron N2930IntelBench 34%, 2,000 samples	3x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	63x
Atom Processor E3800 Series/Celeron Processor N2920/J1900IntelBench 1%, 300 samples	3x

SSD
SSD 64GBBench 53%, 250 samples	4x
SSD 64GBHoodiskBench 63%, 57 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16