Asus Crosshair V Formula

Performance Results


Gaming 23% Surfboard	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	25.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121017
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 06 '17 at 01:22
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 93.4 1-Core 72 2-Core 130 62% 98.3 Pts	4-Core 259 8-Core 455 43% 357 Pts	64-Core 455 28% 455 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 370-$153 39,178 User benchmarks, average bench 21% XFX(1682 2015) Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 22.19.662.4 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	25.8% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 35.3 Parallax 36.7 25% 34.2 fps	MRender 31.3 Gravity 25 Splatting 41.1 27% 32.5 fps
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 25.8% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Corsair Force GT 120GB-$155 13,464 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 83GB free (System drive) Firmware: 5.06 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 17397562 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 16 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -32203664777566 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2291 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 665 (B1) Unknown 0 0 4 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 40834 (C2) HDA temperature 28 62 4063260 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 17397562 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 16 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 17397562 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 17397562 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 16784 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11829 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11829 (F2) Unknown 0 0 14037	57.6% Above average	Read 513 Write 189 Mixed 240 68% 314 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 50 4K Mixed 12.4 82% 29.6 MB/s	DQ Read 27.5 DQ Write 53.7 DQ Mixed 11.8 17% 31 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 83%
Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB-$79 2,261 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 60GB free Firmware: M306 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 166 166 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 137 (09) Power-on hours count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2292 (AB) Unknown 253 253 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 139 (B5) Unknown 253 253 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 139 (C2) HDA temperature 26 0 64426803226 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 253 253 0 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3289 (F1) Unknown 100 100 918 (F2) Unknown 100 100 2954 (FA) Read error retry rate 253 253 0	69% Good	Read 504 Write 302 Mixed 362 86% 389 MB/s	4K Read 22.8 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 13.8 78% 28.5 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 168 DQ Mixed 13.6 53% 117 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 95%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 466GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 81 5438 (04) Start/Stop count 95 95 5815 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4276 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2818 (BF) G-sense error rate 252 252 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 64 141734838296 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 3 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5825	80.8% Excellent	Read 139 Write 142 Mixed 141 106% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.54 144% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 80.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 23.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 18.8 54% 18.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 8.9 SC Mixed 14 33% 11.6 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Crosshair V Formula Builds (Compare 273 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair V Formula - $220

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	82x
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	53x
FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	15x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	13x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	11x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	9x

RAM
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	170x
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	35x
32GBUnknownBench 53%, 5,781 samples	31x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16