Fujitsu FMVE30DTW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.85% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (96%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Fujitsu FMVE30DTW (all builds)
Motherboard	Wistron JAB01Y
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110517
Uptime	1.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '17 at 16:29
Run Duration	668 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	96%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E-350 6,654 User benchmarks, average bench 25% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 1.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	18.9% Very poor	Memory 35.4 1-Core 6 2-Core 19.3 15% 20.2 Pts	4-Core 15 8-Core 22.6 2% 18.8 Pts	64-Core 34.2 2% 34.2 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 18.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6310 13,166 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Fujitsu(10CF 167A) 384MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.0 Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	0.85% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 1.35 Parallax 1.25 1% 1.2 fps	MRender 1.24 Gravity 0.67 Splatting 1.35 1% 1.08 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.85% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 763GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 137 131 4133 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3134 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 89 89 8362 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3115 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 142 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 151 151 147003 (C2) HDA temperature 109 95 34 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	75.5% Very good	Read 137 Write 126 Mixed 121 96% 128 MB/s	4K Read 0.84 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.17 90% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 75.5% Great: 85%
WD Elements 1078 2TB 2,608 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1.5TB free, PID 1078 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Read 27 Write 24.5 Mixed 23 31% 24.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.24 55% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 4,255 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 309GB free, PID 0200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Read 19.3 Write 20 Mixed 12.8 22% 17.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.41 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.19 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 44%
Generic External 1TB 446 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 124GB free, PID 1840 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 19 Write 19.8 Mixed 19.8 25% 19.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.34 70% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 25%
BUFFALO External HDD 500GB 88 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 50GB free, PID 0108 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 19.7 Write 19.8 Mixed 15.7 23% 18.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.33 63% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 21%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 1x4GB 13,596 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	7.34% Terrible	MC Read 4 MC Write 0.7 MC Mixed 3.1 7% 2.6 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.3 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.33 GB/s	Latency 225 18% 225 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 7.34% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Fujitsu FMVE30DTW

Performance Results

PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)