Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (88%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	1.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140106
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '17 at 11:38
Run Duration	297 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	88%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-4350-$57 11,995 User benchmarks, average bench 57% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	40.5% Average	Memory 59.5 1-Core 33.5 2-Core 75.1 36% 56 Pts	4-Core 120 8-Core 158 18% 139 Pts	64-Core 162 10% 162 Pts
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 40.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Palit(1569 1380) 2GB CLim: 1359 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 382.5 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	16.7% Very poor	Lighting 20.8 Reflection 16.1 Parallax 19 17% 18.6 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 20.6 Splatting 16.3 16% 20.2 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.7% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0C3J96R9 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1455 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 259 (64) Unknown 100 100 3130688 (65) Unknown 100 100 647008 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 25 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 98 98 922 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B4) Unknown 100 100 1341 (B7) Unknown 97 97 15 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 39 100 180389937191 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CC) Soft ECC correction 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 97 97 3 (E9) Unknown 100 100 5706 (EA) Unknown 100 100 3528 (F1) Unknown 100 100 4323 (F2) Unknown 100 100 6303 (FA) Read error retry rate 100 100 0	41.1% Average	Read 447 Write 163 Mixed 247 63% 286 MB/s	4K Read 13 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 7.15 38% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 78.8 DQ Write 20 DQ Mixed 20.2 22% 39.7 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 88%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 783GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 2059 (03) Spinup time 175 171 2250 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1356 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 6289 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1352 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 298 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1092 (C2) HDA temperature 113 101 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 1	93.3% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 166 Mixed 153 120% 159 MB/s	4K Read 0.97 4K Write 2.66 4K Mixed 0.37 130% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 93.3% Great: 108%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 64GB 1,861 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 57GB free, PID 1665, nan Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	7.32% Terrible	Read 28.1 Write 7.61 Mixed 7.95 14% 14.6 MB/s	4K Read 6.61 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.02 26% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.32% Great: 10%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23 12,481 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 37GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 29.2 Write 13.1 Mixed 14.2 21% 18.8 MB/s	4K Read 3.62 4K Write 1.49 4K Mixed 0.68 88% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 8GB 525 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	26.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 9.2 27% 9.6 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.1 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 129 31% 129 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 26.3% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	379x
FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	102x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	82x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	44x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	43x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	21x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	43x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBKingstonBench 50%, 19,207 samples	11x
RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 56%, 22,320 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $729

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16