User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics8.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System. .
Motherboardhttp://www.abit.com.tw/ IP35 Pro(Intel P35-ICH9R)
Memory1.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080526
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 21:09
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 73%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6600-$90
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
32.4% Below average
Memory 59.6
1-Core 13.2
2-Core 12.7
24% 28.5 Pts
4-Core 32
8-Core 40
5% 36 Pts
64-Core 46.8
3% 46.8 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 32.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTS 250
Asus(1043 82FB) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
8.07% Terrible
Lighting 11.2
Reflection 10.3
Parallax 3.97
9% 8.49 fps
MRender 4.81
Gravity 8.33
Splatting 8.35
6% 7.16 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.07%
Great: 8%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
22.2% Poor
Read 39.6
Write 37.9
Mixed 24.7
25% 34 MB/s
4K Read 0.22
4K Write 0.77
4K Mixed 0.11
35% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15% Very poor
MC Read 5.9
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 4.4
14% 4.8 GB/s
SC Read 3.6
SC Write 3.4
SC Mixed 4.7
11% 3.9 GB/s
Latency 129
31% 129 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback