Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 07:14
Run Duration253 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 0 GHz, turbo 0 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 95.5
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 637
63% 515 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85ED) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Lighting 67
Reflection 65.9
Parallax 58.9
55% 64 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 63.6
Splatting 67.7
55% 67.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
82GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 505
Write 137
Mixed 201
61% 281 MB/s
4K Read 22.9
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 18.1
104% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 133
DQ Write 141
DQ Mixed 44.6
59% 106 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 82%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 379
Write 304
Mixed 309
74% 331 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 41.2
4K Mixed 30.8
107% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 258
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 106
104% 167 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 124%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
14GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 490
Write 135
Mixed 218
61% 281 MB/s
4K Read 27.1
4K Write 85.7
4K Mixed 18.3
110% 43.7 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 42.3
59% 109 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 82%
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
224GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
56.1% Above average
Read 113
Write 82.6
Mixed 110
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.04
4K Mixed 0.47
113% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 85%
WD Black 640GB (2008)-$25
67GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 112
Write 88.6
Mixed 75
69% 92 MB/s
4K Read 0.63
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.48
117% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 65%
WD My Passport 083A 1TB
51GB free, PID 083a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
15% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 27.5
Mixed 23.2
34% 27.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.38
4K Mixed 0.19
55% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
117% Outstanding
MC Read 49.7
MC Write 39.3
MC Mixed 50
132% 46.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 14.4
SC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 55.5
72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 117%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION Builds (Compare 680 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 57%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV BLACK EDITION

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $431
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback