Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	93.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO (all builds)
Memory	30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '17 at 06:31
Run Duration	579 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	75.9% Very good	Memory 81.8 1-Core 116 2-Core 212 78% 137 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 718 65% 547 Pts	64-Core 1,285 80% 1,285 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gigabyte(1458 3544) 2GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.19% Terrible	Lighting 5.2 Reflection 6.15 Parallax 1.44 4% 4.26 fps	MRender 6.71 Gravity 5.17 Splatting 3.74 4% 5.21 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.19% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 111GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 5408 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1717 (B1) Unknown 98 98 31 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 45 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 11 (EB) Unknown 99 99 813 (F1) Unknown 99 99 13565181882	93.9% Outstanding	Read 515 Write 415 Mixed 420 100% 450 MB/s	4K Read 44.4 4K Write 83.3 4K Mixed 26 145% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 45.1 DQ Write 198 DQ Mixed 25.6 48% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 124%
Toshiba HDWQ140 4TB 4,700 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3.5TB free Firmware: FJ1M Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 6828 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 5 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 0 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 5 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 154620526628 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 253 0 (DC) Disk shift 100 100 0 (DE) Loaded hours 100 100 0 (DF) Load/unload retry count 100 100 0 (E0) Load friction 100 100 0 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 569 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0	112% Outstanding	Read 198 Write 193 Mixed 190 146% 193 MB/s	4K Read 2.87 4K Write 3.01 4K Mixed 0.5 231% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 112%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 179 174 6033 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3002 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 5384 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2737 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 322 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 20704 (C2) HDA temperature 118 104 32 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	82.5% Excellent	Read 140 Write 148 Mixed 133 106% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.21 4K Mixed 0.22 105% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 82.5% Great: 83%
WD WD2500KS-00MJB0 250GB-$78 8,440 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 148GB free Firmware: 02.01C03 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 191 179 5416 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6917 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 37977 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6452 (BE) vendor-specific 67 43 33 (C2) HDA temperature 117 93 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 18 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	31.9% Below average	Read 54.7 Write 56.1 Mixed 55.2 42% 55.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.03 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 31.9% Great: 35%
Seagate ST500DM005 HD502HJ 500GB 10,272 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 109GB free Firmware: 1AJ10001 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 252 252 0 (03) Spinup time 83 82 5299 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3067 (05) Reallocated sector count 252 252 0 (07) Seek error rate 252 252 0 (08) Seek timer performance 252 252 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 5432 (0A) Spinup retry count 252 252 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 252 252 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2856 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 4 (C0) Power-off retract count 252 252 0 (C2) HDA temperature 64 53 206159478815 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 0 (C4) Reallocation count 252 252 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 252 252 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 252 252 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 15 (DF) Load/unload retry count 252 252 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3169	56.8% Above average	Read 104 Write 93.9 Mixed 89.1 72% 95.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 2.57 4K Mixed 0.34 104% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 56.8% Great: 77%
IS917 innostor 64GB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 43GB free, PID 0917 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	41.7% Average	Read 138 Write 70.7 Mixed 53.2 97% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 13.5 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.05 85% 4.84 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 41.7% Great: 38%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 1,865 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 24GB free, PID 6544 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	5.29% Terrible	Read 21.1 Write 5.05 Mixed 5.74 10% 10.6 MB/s	4K Read 4.72 4K Write 0.005 4K Mixed 0.003 18% 1.58 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.29% Great: 9%
Generic Flash Disk 4GB 589 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 1GB free, PID 7788 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	4.88% Terrible	Read 16.4 Write 4.48 Mixed 6.38 9% 9.09 MB/s	4K Read 6.31 4K Write 0.01 4K Mixed 0.007 24% 2.11 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.88% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C14 2x16GB 2,984 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz Performing below potential (49^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	103% Outstanding	MC Read 40.3 MC Write 37.3 MC Mixed 34.6 107% 37.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 38.8 SC Mixed 29.3 88% 30.8 GB/s	Latency 77.3 52% 77.3 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR VI HERO Builds (Compare 1,745 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 92%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 91%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR VI HERO - $227

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	277x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	206x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	191x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	155x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	115x

SSD
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	88x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	60x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	53x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	69x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	44x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $860

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16