Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics70.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive243% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory28.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '17 at 00:25
Run Duration222 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 81.6
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 895
80% 675 Pts
64-Core 1,250
77% 1,250 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega-64LC (Liquid Cooled)-$1,700
AMD(1002 0B36) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1750 MHz, MLim: 945 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.11.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.4% Very good
Lighting 66.8
Reflection 86.2
Parallax 183
54% 112 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 130
Splatting 139
101% 121 fps
Poor: 85%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 98%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
308GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXA7500Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
243% Outstanding
Read 2,503
Write 1,414
Mixed 1,857
426% 1,925 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 49.2
159% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 116
DQ Mixed 82.3
81% 132 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 243%
Great: 306%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
223GB free
Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 486
Write 234
Mixed 301
75% 341 MB/s
4K Read 23.1
4K Write 58.3
4K Mixed 14.9
85% 32.1 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 56.5
77% 141 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 91%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37
112GB free
Firmware: 541ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 151
Write 91.7
Mixed 98.2
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 12
77% 31.8 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 96.6
DQ Mixed 28.7
42% 77.5 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 73%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84% Excellent
Read 146
Write 146
Mixed 143
110% 145 MB/s
4K Read 0.87
4K Write 2.19
4K Mixed 0.28
108% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 84%
Great: 87%
WD WD20NPVX-00EA4T0 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 97.6
Write 102
Mixed 99
75% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 1.86
4K Mixed 0.18
75% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
466GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
69% Good
Read 124
Write 117
Mixed 102
86% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.53
4K Mixed 0.43
110% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 69%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 42.8
MC Write 39
MC Mixed 36.5
113% 39.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 28.6
90% 31.6 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $871
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback