Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive78.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121009
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateNov 03 '17 at 18:09
Run Duration202 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 69.8
2-Core 140
62% 99.7 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 428
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
Device(0000 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.7% Above average
Lighting 33
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 140
27% 70.4 fps
MRender 96.3
Gravity 142
Splatting 116
97% 118 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 494
Write 314
Mixed 332
84% 380 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 47.5
4K Mixed 22.7
111% 35.8 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 52.1
64% 115 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 118%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: MX4O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 146
Write 152
Mixed 150
113% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.88
4K Write 2.02
4K Mixed 0.22
99% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140
899GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Read 137
Write 114
Mixed 122
94% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.35
4K Write 0.42
4K Mixed 0.23
90% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 104%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
366GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
72% Very good
Read 123
Write 127
Mixed 115
92% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.66
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.56
143% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72%
Great: 77%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
93GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 99.2
Write 96.8
Mixed 109
77% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 2.49
4K Mixed 0.34
102% 1.09 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMT8GX3M2A1866C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
53.1% Above average
MC Read 23.4
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 19.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 13.9
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback