Asrock 960GC-GS FX

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

7 years ago, 7 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 960GC-GS FX (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 8 GB
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20131002
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 01 '17 at 19:47
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	6%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320E-$87 33,199 User benchmarks, average bench 58% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 90.2 1-Core 61.3 2-Core 121 58% 90.8 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 341 34% 276 Pts	64-Core 339 21% 339 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 65%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198 440,282 User benchmarks, average bench 33% Gigabyte(1458 36C1) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.41 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	38% Below average	Lighting 50 Reflection 46 Parallax 42.3 41% 46.1 fps	MRender 39.8 Gravity 42.8 Splatting 37.7 33% 40.1 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 128GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 76 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896698552 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2397 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 113 113 35 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3412 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1123 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 2397 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2397 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 193274380320 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	64.4% Good	Read 121 Write 104 Mixed 65.8 72% 96.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.18 69% 0.76 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 103%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85 5,008 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 14GB free (System drive) Firmware: WU100-41 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 7 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5696 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10347 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 14669 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 253 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6351 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 917687 (BE) vendor-specific 136 67 34 (C2) HDA temperature 136 67 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 3760966 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 145	19.7% Very poor	Read 35.5 Write 33 Mixed 29.9 25% 32.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 0.98 4K Mixed 0.26 63% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 33%
Seagate ST3200822AS 200GB-$33 4,227 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 3GB free Firmware: 3.01 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 56 46 13930234 (03) Spinup time 96 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 12086 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 72 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 899289608 (09) Power-on hours count 78 78 19859 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3936 (C2) HDA temperature 34 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 56 46 13930234 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 8 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	19.9% Very poor	Read 33.6 Write 35.5 Mixed 21.9 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.45 4K Write 0.89 4K Mixed 0.28 66% 0.54 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 52217, 52217 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	46.6% Average	MC Read 20.8 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.7 GB/s	SC Read 9.5 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 10.8 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 960GC-GS FX Builds (Compare 130 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock 960GC-GS FX - $122

CPU
FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	30x
FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples	13x
FX-6100AMD $68Bench 54%, 44,863 samples	8x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	15x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	7x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
T253X1120G 120GBTeamBench 65%, 1,708 samples	5x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	4x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	43x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	32x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $207

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16