Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics90.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130705
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 01 '17 at 06:43
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 87.5
1-Core 101
2-Core 197
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 576
61% 486 Pts
64-Core 736
46% 736 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
90.9% Outstanding
Lighting 116
Reflection 119
Parallax 111
94% 115 fps
MRender 100
Gravity 115
Splatting 94.3
84% 103 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$55
19GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Read 490
Write 276
Mixed 280
77% 348 MB/s
4K Read 39.7
4K Write 55.2
4K Mixed 28.4
126% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 63.2
85% 158 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 114%
OCZ Vertex 3 240GB-$80
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 318
Write 176
Mixed 199
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 64.1
4K Mixed 16.2
89% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.1
DQ Write 70.6
DQ Mixed 12.6
20% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 91%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
147GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
8.21% Terrible
Read 17.4
Write 10.7
Mixed 73.2
27% 33.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.31
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.26
71% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 8.21%
Great: 57%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
12GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 143
Write 129
Mixed 127
100% 133 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.58
4K Mixed 0.3
118% 1.26 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
6GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 70.2
Write 63.3
Mixed 71.9
52% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.32
4K Mixed 0.33
109% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.3% Very good
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 28.8
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 70
57% 70 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RAMPAGE IV EXTREME Builds (Compare 1,562 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus RAMPAGE IV EXTREME - $589

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $1,178
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback