Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 65% Destroyer	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	38.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110909
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '17 at 18:31
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Memory 83.6 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 101 51% 78.2 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 200 27% 199 Pts	64-Core 193 12% 193 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% Gigabyte(1458 22C8) CLim: 980 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.9.1 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Lighting 50 Reflection 51.1 Parallax 60.1 41% 53.7 fps	MRender 50.1 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 36.6 35% 44.2 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120 39,518 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM00.Y Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 3919 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 759 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 572 (AD) Unknown 100 100 1441876 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 59 (C2) HDA temperature 59 40 257699545129 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 6042 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 5274 (F2) Unknown 100 100 5015 (F4) Unknown 100 100 22 (F5) Unknown 100 100 84 (F6) Unknown 100 100 1579328	60.2% Good	Read 202 Write 400 Mixed 247 64% 283 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 57.8 4K Mixed 12.8 87% 32.3 MB/s	DQ Read 30.3 DQ Write 86.8 DQ Mixed 15.3 24% 44.2 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 111%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 169GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 4300 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7375 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 67 67 24715 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3749 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 202 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 7172 (C2) HDA temperature 105 87 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 15 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	69.4% Good	Read 135 Write 107 Mixed 69.9 77% 104 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.31 96% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 76%
Seagate ST3160812AS 160GB-$47 10,399 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 73GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 94 77 84208896 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 10194 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 447281404 (09) Power-on hours count 72 72 25327 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 99 0 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5656 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 48 707199018 (C2) HDA temperature 42 52 81604378666 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 47 45 9524860 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	30.1% Below average	Read 53.6 Write 51 Mixed 21.3 31% 42 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.25 4K Mixed 0.31 74% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 30.1% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	32.2% Below average	MC Read 14.3 MC Write 7.3 MC Mixed 11.4 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.2 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 74.1 54% 74.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 32.2% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-890GPA-UD3H Builds (Compare 165 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-890GPA-UD3H

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	36x
Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples	35x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	31x

GPU
Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples	17x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	12x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	10x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	4x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	39x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	30x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	21x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $203

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16