Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA (all builds)
Memory	14 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170607
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '17 at 17:30
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Memory 94.4 1-Core 74.4 2-Core 146 65% 105 Pts	4-Core 270 8-Core 436 43% 353 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EA) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	102% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 163 Parallax 192 95% 157 fps	MRender 133 Gravity 179 Splatting 128 119% 147 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 498GB 301 User benchmarks, average bench 123% 387GB free Firmware: 1.10 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	151% Outstanding	Read 1,014 Write 921 Mixed 1,003 219% 980 MB/s	4K Read 33.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 43.2 160% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 34.5 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 26.8 42% 75.6 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 151% Great: 157%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 1,218 Write 664 Mixed 788 196% 890 MB/s	4K Read 46.3 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 28.3 146% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 244 DQ Write 207 DQ Mixed 91.6 105% 181 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 254%
Seagate ST1000LM014-1EJ1 1TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 861GB free Firmware: SM30 Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	41.9% Average	Read 102 Write 44.6 Mixed 67.2 54% 71.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 0.28 4K Mixed 0.15 51% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Team Xtreem-LV-2133 4x4GB 71 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	MC Read 24.1 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 18.6 55% 19.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 13.2 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 58.6 68% 58.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 85%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970 PRO GAMING/AURA Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 23%

Surfboard

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus 970 PRO GAMING/AURA - $299

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	431x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	112x
FX-8370AMD $175Bench 62%, 34,720 samples	85x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	86x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	66x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	51x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	22x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	18x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	51x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	13x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $588

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16