Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics38% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory20.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120809
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 30 '17 at 15:43
Run Duration230 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-950-$100
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.05 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 91.3
1-Core 81.3
2-Core 163
67% 112 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 411
45% 356 Pts
64-Core 412
26% 412 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
EVGA(3842 3778) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
38% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 41.7
Parallax 55.7
37% 47.7 fps
MRender 56
Gravity 53.3
Splatting 39
39% 49.4 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 38%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
179GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.3% Good
Read 379
Write 187
Mixed 236
59% 267 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 31.9
115% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 126
DQ Mixed 31.2
48% 89.3 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 67.3%
Great: 134%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
371GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 117
Write 107
Mixed 92.1
79% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.13
69% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
123GB free
Firmware: 80.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.6% Below average
Read 75.3
Write 62.6
Mixed 55.6
48% 64.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.44
4K Write 1.63
4K Mixed 0.14
64% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 59%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
34GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
44.7% Average
Read 81.1
Write 74.7
Mixed 56
53% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.41
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.13
58% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 44.7%
Great: 83%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
2GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
68% Good
Read 134
Write 103
Mixed 61.3
74% 99.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
90% 0.94 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3x8GB
3 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
43.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 12.1
MC Mixed 16.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 9
SC Mixed 11.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 73%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,656 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback