Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA

Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	22.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100611
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 30 '17 at 14:55
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom 9750 1,906 User benchmarks, average bench 44% Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	51.5% Above average	Memory 80 1-Core 37.2 2-Core 74.1 44% 63.8 Pts	4-Core 136 8-Core 144 18% 140 Pts	64-Core 139 9% 139 Pts
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 51.5% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% Sapphire(174B E221) 2GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.0 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Lighting 25.5 Reflection 31.8 Parallax 39.5 21% 32.3 fps	MRender 27.7 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 37.1 25% 29.7 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: 583ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 12177739 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 76854144797600 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2795 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 72 (B1) Unknown 0 0 99 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 47 51542687775 (C2) HDA temperature 31 47 51542687775 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 12177739 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 12177739 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 12177739 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 99 99 1 (E9) Unknown 0 0 6017 (EA) Unknown 0 0 5178 (F1) Unknown 0 0 5178 (F2) Unknown 0 0 3968	29.6% Poor	Read 204 Write 94.7 Mixed 91.7 28% 130 MB/s	4K Read 8.63 4K Write 32.2 4K Mixed 9.92 43% 16.9 MB/s	DQ Read 25.1 DQ Write 95.5 DQ Mixed 10.2 22% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 29.6% Great: 73%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: MN6OAA10 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 134 134 87 (03) Spinup time 143 143 34386674056 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5669 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 25 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2886 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2796 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5671 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5671 (C2) HDA temperature 214 214 201864249372 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	75.7% Very good	Read 132 Write 132 Mixed 81.6 85% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.95 4K Mixed 0.38 124% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 75.7% Great: 85%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42 12,070 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 50GB free Firmware: CP100-12 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 253 100 0 (03) Spinup time 100 100 5376 (04) Start/Stop count 84 84 16830 (05) Reallocated sector count 253 253 0 (07) Seek error rate 253 253 0 (08) Seek timer performance 253 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 8251 (0A) Spinup retry count 253 253 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 253 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6428 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 100 134691 (BB) vendor-specific 253 253 720896 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (BE) vendor-specific 80 50 20 (C2) HDA temperature 166 85 24 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 134691 (C4) Reallocation count 253 253 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 2 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 253 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 253 253 0	32.9% Below average	Read 53.9 Write 60.8 Mixed 33.8 37% 49.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.28 66% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x2GB 183,252 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR2 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	26.1% Poor	MC Read 10.3 MC Write 5.7 MC Mixed 10.4 25% 8.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 6.1 15% 5.4 GB/s	Latency 80.6 50% 80.6 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 26.1% Great: 45%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CROSSHAIR II FORMULA Builds (Compare 7 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CROSSHAIR II FORMULA

CPU
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	3x
Phenom II X4 940AMDBench 49%, 3,675 samples	2x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon HD 6770AMDBench 10%, 16,639 samples	2x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	2x
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples	1x

SSD
Premier Pro SP900 128GBAdata $40Bench 69%, 2,820 samples	2x
SSDNow SNV Series 128GBKingstonBench 20%, 1,098 samples	1x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	5x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $215

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16