Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 51% Yacht	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 48% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	256% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170620
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '17 at 22:01
Run Duration	178 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	28%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	73% Very good	Memory 72.3 1-Core 104 2-Core 207 71% 128 Pts	4-Core 396 8-Core 644 64% 520 Pts	64-Core 830 51% 830 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 73% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3283) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2416 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.3% Good	Lighting 77.9 Reflection 76.7 Parallax 76.2 64% 76.9 fps	MRender 84.5 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 68.9 60% 74.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 265GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	256% Outstanding	Read 2,758 Write 1,304 Mixed 1,416 401% 1,826 MB/s	4K Read 52.7 4K Write 102 4K Mixed 40.6 186% 65.3 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 161 DQ Mixed 91.7 105% 183 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 256% Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2016)-$114 34,353 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 72 45997502 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 35122 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 -53051436040192 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 77 77 387121175 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 10 (C2) HDA temperature 23 40 73014444055 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -50418621087744 (F1) Unknown 100 253 43764414 (F2) Unknown 100 253 2233088	93.7% Outstanding	Read 167 Write 160 Mixed 143 117% 156 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.78 4K Mixed 0.27 93% 0.92 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 105%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB 12,928 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 316GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 5 (03) Spinup time 174 170 4258 (04) Start/Stop count 82 82 18568 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 63 63 27596 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4985 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 93 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 194 194 18474 (C2) HDA temperature 122 88 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	49.1% Average	Read 84.6 Write 86.1 Mixed 71.7 61% 80.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.27 103% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88 40,945 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 58GB free Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 91 226036712 (03) Spinup time 94 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3914 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 14 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 445086252 (09) Power-on hours count 44 44 49828 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 31 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1607 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 1 1 807 (BC) Unknown 100 97 47245361169 (BD) vendor-specific 1 1 325 (BE) vendor-specific 70 40 1155850960926 (C2) HDA temperature 30 60 4294967326 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 28 21 226036712 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 10 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -21530671005624 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2769922067 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3330629438	36.1% Below average	Read 63.5 Write 61.9 Mixed 55.8 45% 60.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.35 4K Mixed 0.33 81% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 70%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	75.4% Very good	MC Read 28.5 MC Write 27.4 MC Mixed 25.4 77% 27.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.4 SC Write 28.6 SC Mixed 22.9 68% 23.6 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 108%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)