Asus A88X-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	82.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus A88X-PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160310
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '17 at 17:35
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	22%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51 29,887 User benchmarks, average bench 45% FM2+ , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 76.5 2-Core 133 60% 97.6 Pts	4-Core 236 8-Core 237 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 235 14% 235 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XFX(1682 9385) CLim: 1030 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.10.3 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	39.7% Below average	Lighting 50.6 Reflection 52.4 Parallax 58.9 41% 54 fps	MRender 51.5 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 38.4 37% 45.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 39.7% Great: 40%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT01B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3083 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 927 (B1) Unknown 98 98 29 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 53 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 22 (EB) Unknown 99 99 39 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12739234045	82.4% Excellent	Read 492 Write 382 Mixed 409 95% 428 MB/s	4K Read 37 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 25.1 125% 44.1 MB/s	DQ Read 36.1 DQ Write 62 DQ Mixed 20.1 23% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 124%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$30 168,449 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 120GB free Firmware: 0001SDM1 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 119 99 208277624 (03) Spinup time 99 99 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 711 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 138326774 (09) Power-on hours count 97 97 53794465385393 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 709 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 2 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 52 454688794 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 92 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 85 85 30615 (C2) HDA temperature 26 48 77309411354 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 97 97 -115032109085987 (F1) Unknown 100 253 17800059612 (F2) Unknown 100 253 23895218196 (FE) Unknown 100 100 0	51.3% Above average	Read 88 Write 91.1 Mixed 74.6 63% 84.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.18 51% 0.44 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 61%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB 13,629 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 22GB free Firmware: 01.01B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1 (03) Spinup time 160 150 4991 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3807 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12056 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3584 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 478 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 180 180 61361 (C2) HDA temperature 117 91 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 22430 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	35.3% Below average	Read 62.4 Write 60.2 Mixed 58.7 46% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.36 4K Write 2.04 4K Mixed 0.32 88% 0.91 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston KHX2400C11D3/4GX 8GB 262 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	43.5% Average	MC Read 19.7 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 18.2 44% 15.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.9 SC Write 8.3 SC Mixed 12.8 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 75.3 53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 43.5% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical A88X-PRO Builds (Compare 129 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus A88X-PRO - $278

CPU
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples	36x
A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)AMD $467Bench 51%, 11,295 samples	18x
A10-7870K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 46%, 9,821 samples	14x

GPU
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples	21x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	7x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	5x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	6x
HyperX 3K 240GBKingston $70Bench 81%, 27,495 samples	5x

RAM
F3-2400C10-8GTX 16GBUnknownBench 40%, 126 samples	5x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 58%, 8,730 samples	3x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 4x8GBKingstonBench 72%, 94 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 49% - Average

Total price: $441

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16