Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results


Gaming 18% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	52.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds)
Memory	13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20131023
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '17 at 10:56
Run Duration	171 Seconds
Run User	LKA-User
Background CPU	29%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77% Very good	Memory 90.9 1-Core 103 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 346 8-Core 465 51% 405 Pts	64-Core 487 30% 487 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92 309,423 User benchmarks, average bench 17% Gigabyte(1458 36D1) CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	18% Very poor	Lighting 22.3 Reflection 17 Parallax 20.8 18% 20 fps	MRender 25.2 Gravity 24.3 Splatting 17.4 18% 22.3 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 535 Series 240GB-$200 9,142 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 119GB free (System drive) Firmware: RG21 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 5 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 36 100 107376869412 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 3763 (E2) Load-in time 100 100 65535 (E3) Torque amplification count 100 100 60 (E4) Power-off retract count 100 100 65535 (E8) Unknown 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 100 100 0 (F1) Unknown 100 100 3763 (F2) Unknown 100 100 3887 (F9) Unknown 100 100 121	52.5% Above average	Read 323 Write 239 Mixed 277 62% 280 MB/s	4K Read 24.6 4K Write 59.9 4K Mixed 9.54 81% 31.3 MB/s	DQ Read 29.4 DQ Write 56.6 DQ Mixed 12.7 18% 32.9 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 95%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 613GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 140 140 69 (03) Spinup time 125 125 25789530415 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 275 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 199 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 157 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 275 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 275 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 201865101346 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	58.5% Above average	Read 94.1 Write 109 Mixed 4.76 50% 69.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.96 4K Mixed 0.22 90% 0.96 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.5% Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 207GB free Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 139 139 70 (03) Spinup time 124 124 25789792561 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 3891 (05) Reallocated sector count 82 82 500 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 124 124 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 4400 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2232 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 4892 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 4892 (C2) HDA temperature 176 176 219044970530 (C4) Reallocation count 68 68 740 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	62.9% Good	Read 113 Write 107 Mixed 52.7 67% 90.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.09 4K Write 0.23 4K Mixed 0.08 17% 0.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.5 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 16.3 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.8 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16.2 GB/s	Latency 65.9 61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	869x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	596x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	355x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	375x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	252x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	182x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	172x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	98x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	87x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	52x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	45x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $405

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16