Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 101% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	122% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	239% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170526
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 28 '17 at 17:07
Run Duration	174 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125 140,440 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.2% Excellent	Memory 89 1-Core 120 2-Core 238 84% 149 Pts	4-Core 481 8-Core 718 75% 599 Pts	64-Core 966 60% 966 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 89.2% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% MSI(1462 3602) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing below potential (40^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	122% Outstanding	Lighting 164 Reflection 194 Parallax 190 134% 182 fps	MRender 127 Gravity 177 Splatting 124 116% 143 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	239% Outstanding	Read 2,663 Write 1,125 Mixed 1,347 375% 1,712 MB/s	4K Read 53.3 4K Write 92.3 4K Mixed 40.2 181% 61.9 MB/s	DQ Read 263 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 70.9 89% 162 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 239% Great: 236%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$38 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 68GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 3400196 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 -50216757622415 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 694 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 171 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 47 73017524252 (C2) HDA temperature 28 47 73017524252 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3400196 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3400196 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3400196 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 96 96 81604378625 (E9) Unknown 0 0 8917 (EA) Unknown 0 0 1131 (F1) Unknown 0 0 1131 (F2) Unknown 0 0 1674 (F4) Unknown 99 99 3866683	60.7% Good	Read 413 Write 120 Mixed 166 51% 233 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 17.8 108% 41.8 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 35.6 50% 91.8 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 60.7% Great: 73%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 13GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 1 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 8023 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 2253 (B1) Unknown 89 89 122 (B3) Unknown 100 1 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 1 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 69 46 31 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 178 (F1) Unknown 99 99 30687648106	84.2% Excellent	Read 482 Write 350 Mixed 343 87% 392 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 55.9 4K Mixed 22.9 121% 39.9 MB/s	DQ Read 227 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 55.4 74% 137 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 48GB free Firmware: CC49 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 113 99 51741144 (03) Spinup time 97 97 0 (04) Start/Stop count 98 98 2305 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 60 121289981 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2248 (B7) Unknown 99 99 1 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 97 8590065674 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 73 46 454426651 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 144 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 12163 (C2) HDA temperature 27 54 42949672987 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 1 6530 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 56380035702310 (F1) Unknown 100 253 48742412238 (F2) Unknown 100 253 66709774355	107% Outstanding	Read 201 Write 174 Mixed 150 131% 175 MB/s	4K Read 0.62 4K Write 1.62 4K Mixed 0.37 96% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 112%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LED DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$161 35,811 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	MC Read 43 MC Write 37.2 MC Mixed 35.1 110% 38.4 GB/s	SC Read 23.6 SC Write 39.8 SC Mixed 27.2 86% 30.2 GB/s	Latency 68.4 58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)