Clevo P870DM-G

Performance Results


Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	27.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	Clevo P870DM-G (all builds)
Motherboard	CLEVO P870DM-G powered by premamod.com
Memory	27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161031
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 27 '17 at 21:21
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 93.8 1-Core 144 2-Core 286 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 537 8-Core 782 82% 660 Pts	64-Core 787 49% 787 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6,247 User benchmarks, average bench 31% Clevo(1558 0871) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1038 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.5% Poor	Lighting 32.7 Reflection 38 Parallax 30.6 27% 33.8 fps	MRender 43.6 Gravity 32.4 Splatting 32.7 29% 36.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 217GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 6586 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 516 (B1) Unknown 99 99 12 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 71 37 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 1 (EB) Unknown 99 99 18 (F1) Unknown 99 99 27187740329
Poor: 80% Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210 25,365 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 212GB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 3168 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 1941 (B1) Unknown 99 99 7 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 42 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 28 (EB) Unknown 99 99 188 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12116631004	110% Outstanding	Read 528 Write 495 Mixed 517 115% 513 MB/s	4K Read 37.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 27.1 149% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 298 DQ Mixed 156 162% 268 MB/s
Poor: 77% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 512GB 18,578 User benchmarks, average bench 191% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: Unknown Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 755 Write 740 Mixed 530 150% 675 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 17.3 129% 51.6 MB/s	DQ Read 32.9 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 17.1 29% 53.5 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 332%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 4x8GB 216 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	76.5% Very good	MC Read 25.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 25.2 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.5 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 23.6 70% 24.6 GB/s	Latency 60.4 66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 79%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16