HP 20-b247la

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 20-b247la  (all builds)
MotherboardPEGATRON 2AED
Memory2.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 8
BIOS Date20130123
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '17 at 23:24
Run Duration101 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1610-$37
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 85.3
1-Core 71.7
2-Core 143
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 144
19% 144 Pts
64-Core 144
9% 144 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
HP(103C 2AED) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.3325
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.6% Terrible
Lighting 1.67
Reflection 1.69
Parallax 1.28
1% 1.55 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 1
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.44 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.6%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 91.5
Write 80
Mixed 90.9
66% 87.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 0.85
4K Mixed 0.24
62% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
27% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 8.8
MC Mixed 7.8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 8.1
22% 7.57 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 27%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback