Asrock Z370M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 128% UFO	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 119% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	50.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock Z370M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170911
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '17 at 20:12
Run Duration	228 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	97.1% Outstanding	Memory 90.2 1-Core 149 2-Core 289 97% 176 Pts	4-Core 559 8-Core 930 91% 744 Pts	64-Core 1,148 71% 1,148 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 97.1% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	137% Outstanding	Lighting 193 Reflection 207 Parallax 185 157% 195 fps	MRender 135 Gravity 189 Splatting 133 123% 152 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 137% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1629 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 31 (B1) Unknown 100 100 0 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 63 49 37 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 2 (F1) Unknown 99 99 705075797	98.9% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 390 Mixed 414 97% 438 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 47.9 164% 61.1 MB/s	DQ Read 47 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 29.3 36% 62.2 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 98.9% Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 233GB free Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 22153 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 851 (B1) Unknown 98 98 19 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 58 47 42 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 440 (F1) Unknown 99 99 9804248718	74.1% Very good	Read 508 Write 224 Mixed 341 79% 357 MB/s	4K Read 29.5 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 22.6 115% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 43.2 DQ Write 230 DQ Mixed 21.1 50% 98.3 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 118%
Corsair Force 3 120GB-$109 22,358 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.3.2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 92 92 8877511 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 35 35 19258633413045 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2666 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 211 (B1) Unknown 0 0 10 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 8877511 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 8877511 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 8877511 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 95 95 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 29864 (EA) Unknown 0 0 20335 (F1) Unknown 0 0 20335 (F2) Unknown 0 0 42092	50.1% Above average	Read 208 Write 140 Mixed 165 38% 171 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 11.7 105% 48.3 MB/s	DQ Read 25 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 41.3 41% 62.7 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 61%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100 65,786 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 403GB free Firmware: 1AA01113 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 52 65 (03) Spinup time 76 76 7970 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6003 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 40748 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 81 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 5070 (0D) Soft read error rate 100 52 65 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 5433 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 65 42 589430819 (C2) HDA temperature 63 42 87416092360741 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 166347 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 99 39 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 253 253 0	63.2% Good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 107 82% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.73 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.43 120% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 62%
WD Black 3TB (2012)-$205 1,332 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 241GB free Firmware: 01.01L01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 140 10183 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1825 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 69 69 22651 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1614 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 115 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1709 (C2) HDA temperature 101 81 51 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	87% Excellent	Read 158 Write 144 Mixed 131 109% 145 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 3.05 4K Mixed 0.42 136% 1.41 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 92%
WD My Book 1130 2TB 1,666 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 62GB free, PID 1130 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Read 36.6 Write 34.6 Mixed 17 36% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.14 68% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45 653,654 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.4% Average	MC Read 14 MC Write 14.1 MC Mixed 11.1 37% 13.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 14.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 66.9 60% 66.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 40.4% Great: 110%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z370M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 55%

Yacht

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 50%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asrock Z370M Pro4

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	269x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	222x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	186x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	92x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	84x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	81x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	38x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	30x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	24x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	34x
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	34x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	32x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $445

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16