Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 25 '17 at 19:49
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-7900X-$420
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
83.3% Excellent
Memory 80
1-Core 127
2-Core 237
82% 148 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 892
81% 678 Pts
64-Core 1,674
104% 1,674 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 83.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
105% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 186
Parallax 196
99% 168 fps
MRender 132
Gravity 187
Splatting 127
120% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 105%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
374GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,827
Write 1,296
Mixed 1,191
318% 1,438 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 47.8
4K Mixed 31.6
135% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 543
DQ Write 60.9
DQ Mixed 56
103% 220 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 206%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
262GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Mushkin Chronos 120GB-$70
70GB free
Firmware: 504ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.5% Average
Read 194
Write 141
Mixed 151
36% 162 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 9.11
66% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 165
DQ Write 115
DQ Mixed 37.6
56% 106 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 84%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
442GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 52.5
Write 63.9
Mixed 83.4
51% 66.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.25
4K Mixed 0.16
62% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba X300 4TB-$146
68GB free
Firmware: FP2A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 138
Write 113
Mixed 111
91% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.25
4K Write 2.91
4K Mixed 0.22
130% 1.46 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
68GB free
Firmware: CC27 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 120
Write 153
Mixed 109
95% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.08
4K Write 1.37
4K Mixed 0.23
96% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X8GC3000C15K4 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 34.4
MC Write 64
MC Mixed 35.6
128% 44.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.9
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 12.3
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 80.5
50% 80.5 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING Builds (Compare 1,716 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 103%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 104%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X299-E GAMING - $275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,338
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback