Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 49% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	77.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170302
Uptime	0.7 Days
Run Date	Oct 25 '17 at 10:00
Run Duration	159 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	62.4% Good	Memory 68.4 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 155 61% 105 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 578 52% 441 Pts	64-Core 905 56% 905 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Elitegroup(1019 1039) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.0 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.2% Very good	Lighting 95.7 Reflection 109 Parallax 92.9 78% 99.1 fps	MRender 91.8 Gravity 91.5 Splatting 93.6 76% 92.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 512GB 173 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 94GB free Firmware: 0 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 415 Write 396 Mixed 410 91% 407 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 38.2 4K Mixed 23.9 81% 27.4 MB/s	DQ Read 145 DQ Write 150 DQ Mixed 72.2 75% 122 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 74%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,132 Write 1,344 Mixed 1,168 341% 1,548 MB/s	4K Read 48.3 4K Write 84.9 4K Mixed 24.7 150% 52.6 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 131 DQ Mixed 77.8 83% 139 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 254%
Seagate Barracuda Pro 6TB (2016)-$149 321 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: DN03 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 77 64 47962721 (03) Spinup time 84 84 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 217 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 70 60 9949499 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 60163901882622 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 7 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 72 58 655949852 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 443 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 1 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 100 100 706 (C2) HDA temperature 28 42 85899345948 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 2 1 47962721 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 10200547328051 (F1) Unknown 100 253 5522926108 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1385576718
Poor: 23% Great: 118%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 519GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 176 172 4183 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 1265 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 4361 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 252 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 11 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 196 196 12609 (C2) HDA temperature 119 105 28 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	46.5% Average	Read 86.5 Write 75.3 Mixed 79.4 61% 80.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.57 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.16 76% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 84%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	37.9% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.1 36% 12.5 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 14.7 41% 14.4 GB/s	Latency 105 38% 105 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $80Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $744

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)