Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160520
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 24 '17 at 16:06
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 85%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4500-$37
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 91
1-Core 108
2-Core 226
80% 142 Pts
4-Core 174
8-Core 220
25% 197 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.0
Performing below potential (99th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (72 fps cap detected)
58% Above average
Lighting 71.4
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 60.9
58% 68.1 fps
MRender 71.6
Gravity 67.5
Splatting 72
58% 70.4 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 337
Mixed 356
88% 400 MB/s
4K Read 42.3
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 22.3
132% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 259
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 21.1
76% 169 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 90%
Great: 118%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
423GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Read 143
Write 145
Mixed 135
106% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.22
4K Write 2.54
4K Mixed 0.38
140% 1.38 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
361GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
31.6% Below average
Read 56.4
Write 53.3
Mixed 74.6
47% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.41
4K Mixed 0.2
67% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.6%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 14.7
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.3
41% 14.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 13.9
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 65.8
61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 5,908 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $197
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback