ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Graphics	11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	89.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 8.1
BIOS Date	20130813
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Sep 05 '14 at 20:31
Run Duration	265 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770S-$95 10,699 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 97.2 2-Core 192 66% 145 Pts	4-Core 336 8-Core 551 54% 444 Pts	64-Core 551 34% 551 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120 66,662 User benchmarks, average bench 15% Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 9.18.13.4052 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	11% Very poor	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 15.2 Parallax 16.9 9% 14.3 fps	MRender 23 Gravity 16.9 Splatting 16.9 15% 18.9 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 11% Great: 16%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 163GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM04B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9596 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 849 (B1) Unknown 95 95 171 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 62 57 38 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 98 98 2011 (EB) Unknown 99 99 327 (F1) Unknown 99 99 12425411891	89.7% Excellent	Read 512 Write 448 Mixed 490 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 60 4K Mixed 20.3 98% 35.6 MB/s	DQ Read 291 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 67.4 111% 213 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 116%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 618GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 165 154 6733 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4015 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 46 46 39671 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 240 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3998 (C2) HDA temperature 108 102 42 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	19.7% Very poor	Read 38.1 Write 30.6 Mixed 39.5 27% 36.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.001 4K Write 0.002 4K Mixed 0.001 0% 0.001 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 19.7% Great: 51%
WD WD4000YS-01M 400GB 185 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 171GB free Firmware: 07.02E07 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 239 219 5025 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11360 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 24 24 56163 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2229 (C2) HDA temperature 107 93 45 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 23 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	22.6% Poor	Read 38.6 Write 39.7 Mixed 38.9 30% 39.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.97 4K Mixed 0.39 107% 1 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 40%
Seagate ST3320620NS 320GB-$40 953 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 5GB free Firmware: 3.AEG Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 98 88 233320287 (03) Spinup time 97 95 0 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 7793 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 936019730 (09) Power-on hours count 60 60 35631 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2065 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 61 45 656736295 (C2) HDA temperature 39 55 64424509479 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 57 47 1440404 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 1 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 99 252 1	34.2% Below average	Read 69.7 Write 49.6 Mixed 49.4 42% 56.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.99 4K Mixed 0.26 68% 0.58 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical P8Z77-V DELUXE Builds (Compare 882 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 59%

Gunboat

Desktop

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 49%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V DELUXE

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	455x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	159x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	98x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	54x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	53x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	39x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	42x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	28x
840 Pro 256GBSamsung $190Bench 95%, 73,119 samples	27x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 20,667 samples	40x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBCorsairBench 54%, 43,127 samples	19x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	18x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $387

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback