ADD TO PC
BUILD

User System

Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 66% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	95.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	81.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Supermicro X8DAL
Memory	21.6 GB free of 24.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111230
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 24 '17 at 01:11
Run Duration	107 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5675 4,275 User benchmarks, average bench 68% CPU 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	66.3% Good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 82.3 2-Core 165 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 543 53% 436 Pts	64-Core 1,284 80% 1,284 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 384.94 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	95.1% Outstanding	Lighting 112 Reflection 150 Parallax 138 91% 133 fps	MRender 120 Gravity 143 Splatting 116 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 129GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9327 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 884 (B1) Unknown 99 99 15 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 58 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 23 (EB) Unknown 99 99 36 (F1) Unknown 99 99 8558599674	81.8% Excellent	Read 270 Write 258 Mixed 266 59% 265 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 79.5 4K Mixed 43.6 149% 52.3 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 151 127% 183 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 81.8% Great: 124%
Volume0 2TB 300 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 727GB free Firmware: 1.0. Max speed: n/a Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	117% Outstanding	Read 215 Write 191 Mixed 201 152% 202 MB/s	4K Read 1.65 4K Write 3.33 4K Mixed 0.64 202% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 125%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 HMT151R7BFR4C-H9 MXIC 25L3205 60GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 33 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	MC Read 23.9 MC Write 16.7 MC Mixed 21.1 59% 20.6 GB/s	SC Read 11.1 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.8 23% 8.07 GB/s	Latency 98.1 41% 98.1 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback