Asrock Z270 Extreme4

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 70% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	93.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	80.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Z270 Extreme4 (all builds)
Memory	5.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170329
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '17 at 03:30
Run Duration	255 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	6%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600K-$190 195,006 User benchmarks, average bench 76% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	97.2% Outstanding	Memory 95.4 1-Core 143 2-Core 285 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 571 8-Core 571 76% 571 Pts	64-Core 563 35% 563 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 97.2% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6676) CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.4% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 122 Parallax 103 98% 115 fps	MRender 99.3 Gravity 106 Splatting 102 84% 103 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 93.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: CS131122 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 959 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 116 (A8) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 180 (AD) Unknown 100 100 65539 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 46 (C2) HDA temperature 98 98 128850984990 (DA) Unknown 100 100 0 (E7) Temperature 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 355	80.3% Excellent	Read 503 Write 347 Mixed 351 89% 400 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 71.7 4K Mixed 10.2 94% 36.9 MB/s	DQ Read 320 DQ Write 237 DQ Mixed 48.1 98% 202 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 80.3% Great: 97%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 929GB free Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 68 (03) Spinup time 128 128 12896567476 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 1606 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 105 105 38 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 7969 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 676 (C0) Power-off retract count 99 99 1607 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 1607 (C2) HDA temperature 200 200 193274642462 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	105% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 187 Mixed 175 136% 181 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.76 4K Mixed 0.17 84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 107%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48 240,965 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 478GB free Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2300 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 537 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 956 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 106 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 49 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 1108 (C2) HDA temperature 113 109 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	94.1% Outstanding	Read 157 Write 171 Mixed 160 122% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.01 4K Write 2.45 4K Mixed 0.28 119% 1.25 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 94.1% Great: 108%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 1,619 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 839GB free, PID a00e Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	40.3% Average	Read 100 Write 94.4 Mixed 78.5 115% 91.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 1.64 4K Mixed 0.21 65% 0.78 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 40.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 1x8GB 10,361 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	44.7% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16 MC Mixed 12.2 42% 14.9 GB/s	SC Read 10.5 SC Write 14.5 SC Mixed 12 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 55.9 72% 55.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 46%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z270 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 1,177 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 89%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 76%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Extreme4 - $170

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	624x
Core i5-7600KIntel $190Bench 76%, 195,006 samples	173x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	124x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	124x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	108x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	68x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	38x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	37x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	59x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	48x
Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GBG.SKILL $40Bench 71%, 98,777 samples	43x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $964

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16