Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory	0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140609
Uptime	8.4 Days
Run Date	Oct 22 '17 at 21:36
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Memory 82.9 1-Core 106 2-Core 184 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 342 8-Core 502 53% 422 Pts	64-Core 547 34% 547 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 8473) 2GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.33 Reflection 2.69 Parallax 0.62 2% 1.88 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2 2% 2.31 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston RBU-SC400S3764G 64GB 160 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free Firmware: 505ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 3711981 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 69423851375072 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4986 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 40 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 28 79 60134719516 (C2) HDA temperature 28 79 60134719516 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 3711981 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 3711981 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 3711981 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 79 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2 (F2) Unknown 0 0 62	61.1% Good	Read 460 Write 87.9 Mixed 148 50% 232 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 88.2 4K Mixed 15.5 115% 45.3 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 88.3 DQ Mixed 32.7 42% 74.3 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 61.1% Great: 71%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 807GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 1 (02) Throughput performance 142 142 71 (03) Spinup time 126 126 12896829621 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 5010 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 118 118 33 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 2530 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4985 (C0) Power-off retract count 96 96 5010 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 96 96 5010 (C2) HDA temperature 187 187 188979544096 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	88% Excellent	Read 149 Write 158 Mixed 153 116% 153 MB/s	4K Read 0.35 4K Write 1.85 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 88% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 1x4GB 7,467 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	MC Read 10.7 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.5 28% 9.83 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 7.9 24% 8.47 GB/s	Latency 75.4 53% 75.4 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 26%

Raft

Desktop 78%

Battleship

Workstation 22%

Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

CPU
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	413x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	397x
Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples	350x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	162x
GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples	156x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	142x

SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	48x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	44x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	37x

RAM
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 55%, 9,947 samples	217x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 3,029 samples	215x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	112x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $324

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16