PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 94.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME Z270-P (all builds) |
Memory | 10.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20170906 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Oct 22 '17 at 15:58 |
Run Duration | 121 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
64%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
XFX(1682 3222) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.10.1
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
94.2%
Outstanding
|
||||
96.6%
Outstanding
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE Samsung M378A5143DB0-CPB 12GB
2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
62.7%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-7700KIntel $250Bench 84%, 712,312 samples | 2,038x |
Core i5-7600KIntel $210Bench 76%, 195,006 samples | 1,058x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 751x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 832x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 821x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 540x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $665 |