Asus P5N-EM HDMI

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 50% Yacht	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.37% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	60.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P5N-EM HDMI (all builds)
Memory	2.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 21:12
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170 24,176 User benchmarks, average bench 46% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	53% Above average	Memory 80.2 1-Core 37.9 2-Core 76.1 44% 64.7 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 153 20% 153 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 53% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000 15,855 User benchmarks, average bench 6% HP(103C 084A) 1GB CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.61 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.37% Terrible	Lighting 7.37 Reflection 8.19 Parallax 5.56 6% 7.04 fps	MRender 9.67 Gravity 7.9 Splatting 8.52 7% 8.7 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 6.37% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 148GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	60.6% Good	Read 261 Write 178 Mixed 199 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 50.9 4K Mixed 27.7 113% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 167 DQ Write 58.3 DQ Mixed 38.9 48% 88 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 60.6% Great: 124%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 148GB free Firmware: GM4O Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	40% Below average	Read 71 Write 68.2 Mixed 75.9 54% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 1.44 4K Mixed 0.35 83% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 50%
Hitachi HDP725050GLA 500GB 1,228 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 221GB free Firmware: GM4O Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	46.1% Average	Read 78.7 Write 81.8 Mixed 78.7 60% 79.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.37 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.31 78% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 3 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	13.8% Very poor	MC Read 3.6 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.53 GB/s	SC Read 4.6 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.37 GB/s	Latency 80.2 50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P5N-EM HDMI Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5N-EM HDMI

CPU
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	1x
Pentium E6800IntelBench 41%, 851 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 430NvidiaBench 3%, 22,369 samples	1x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x
GeForce 7100 / nForce 630iNvidiaBench 0%, 395 samples	1x

SSD
Mobile 120GB SSDAvantBench 48%, 1 sample	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $110

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16