Asus P5Q-WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-WS  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090708
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 21 '17 at 20:39
Run Duration255 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 52
2-Core 110
51% 80.9 Pts
4-Core 218
8-Core 219
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 221
14% 221 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1815 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 385.69
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
52.5% Above average
Lighting 64.7
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 62.8
53% 66 fps
MRender 75.1
Gravity 62.8
Splatting 56.4
52% 64.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 52.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra Plus 256GB-$139
237GB free
Firmware: X2306RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44% Average
Read 210
Write 209
Mixed 189
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 21.6
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 12.6
73% 26.7 MB/s
DQ Read 21.5
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 12.7
15% 26 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 44%
Great: 99%
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41320RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.6% Below average
Read 203
Write 148
Mixed 147
37% 166 MB/s
4K Read 21.9
4K Write 28.7
4K Mixed 10.8
62% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 22.3
DQ Write 36.3
DQ Mixed 11.5
14% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 36.6%
Great: 108%
Hitachi HDS724040KLSA80 400GB-$133
371GB free
Firmware: KFAOA32A Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 53.6
Write 49.6
Mixed 53.5
39% 52.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.68
4K Mixed 0.35
93% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 32%
Mass Storage Device 32GB
25GB free, PID 1212
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
5.77% Terrible
Read 17.7
Write 10.9
Mixed 9.14
15% 12.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.44
4K Write 0.009
4K Mixed 0.006
13% 1.15 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.77%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
27.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 8.3
25% 8.6 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 9.1
24% 8.53 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 27.2%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-WS Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 26% - Poor Total price: $408
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback