Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	37.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte H110M-H
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF (all builds)
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20161116
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 18:28
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing as expected (58^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 114 2-Core 199 77% 133 Pts	4-Core 289 8-Core 287 38% 288 Pts	64-Core 289 18% 289 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Sapphire(174B 3001) CLim: 1020 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.4.4 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	37.7% Below average	Lighting 49.3 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 64.7 40% 48.9 fps	MRender 31 Gravity 47.6 Splatting 40.7 33% 39.8 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 0 100 1324 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 350 (A5) Unknown 100 100 2624283804529 (A6) Unknown 100 100 1 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 14 (A9) Unknown 100 100 0 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 7 (AE) Unknown 100 100 166 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 49 36 274877906995 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 1258432233765 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 880 (EA) Unknown 100 100 4145 (F1) Unknown 253 253 1816 (F2) Unknown 253 253 3407 (F4) Unknown 0 100 0	49.4% Average	Read 499 Write 92.2 Mixed 216 58% 269 MB/s	4K Read 17.3 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 4.3 66% 28.6 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 76.6 DQ Mixed 6.7 37% 87.8 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 78%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 319GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 1512 (03) Spinup time 139 137 4016 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3566 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 90 90 7985 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2214 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 303 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3262 (C2) HDA temperature 102 86 41 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 24 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	61.5% Good	Read 107 Write 107 Mixed 105 80% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.68 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.46 113% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 61.5% Great: 69%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 205GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 168 2291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 918 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 96 96 3594 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 582 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 187 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 735 (C2) HDA temperature 104 90 39 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 207 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	86% Excellent	Read 153 Write 147 Mixed 118 104% 139 MB/s	4K Read 0.98 4K Write 2.09 4K Mixed 0.22 104% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSCK.8FBD 1x8GB 1,491 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	32.8% Below average	MC Read 12.3 MC Write 10.8 MC Mixed 9.2 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 7.8 SC Mixed 9.5 26% 9.17 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 47%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,440 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	717x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	478x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	304x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	452x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	390x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	252x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	267x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	131x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	120x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	126x
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	75x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	70x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $138

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16