ECS MCP61M-M3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	32.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (39%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	ECS MCP61M-M3 (all builds)
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100426
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 14:45
Run Duration	98 Seconds
Run User	UKR-User
Background CPU	39%

PC Performing as expected (59^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X3 445-$100 3,101 User benchmarks, average bench 44% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Memory 69.1 1-Core 46.1 2-Core 91.5 44% 68.9 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 110 15% 109 Pts	64-Core 135 8% 135 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Gigabyte(1458 3542) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.28 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Lighting 38.9 Reflection 35.5 Parallax 45.7 32% 40 fps	MRender 48.9 Gravity 45.8 Splatting 36.8 35% 43.8 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 31%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Black 2.5" 320GB (2010)-$45 23,554 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 223GB free (System drive) Firmware: 12.0 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 56.1 Write 58.2 Mixed 59.8 44% 58 MB/s	4K Read 0.55 4K Write 1.67 4K Mixed 0.31 88% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown Team--Elite-133300 Team--Elite-133300 4GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 667, 667 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.3% Below average	MC Read 13.9 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 12 32% 11 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.9 21% 7.37 GB/s	Latency 104 39% 104 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 34%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MCP61M-M3 Builds (Compare 67 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS MCP61M-M3

CPU
Athlon II X2 250 (2013 D.Ri)AMDBench 40%, 19,471 samples	18x
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	8x
Phenom II X4 840AMD $150Bench 47%, 5,147 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	11x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	9x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	4x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 60GBKingston $76Bench 48%, 24,219 samples	2x
120G B 120GBSSDBench 54%, 43 samples	2x

RAM
99P5474-013.A00LF0 1x4GBKingstonBench 26%, 22 samples	6x
9905403-176.A00LF 2x2GBKingstonBench 40%, 57 samples	4x
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GBKingstonBench 32%, 29,968 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16