Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results


Gaming 55% Yacht	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus H170M-E D3 (all builds)
Memory	6.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160922
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 13:08
Run Duration	145 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	89.3% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 129 2-Core 256 89% 159 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 503 67% 504 Pts	64-Core 503 31% 503 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 89.3% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.9% Above average	Lighting 73.6 Reflection 75.5 Parallax 65.1 60% 71.4 fps	MRender 70.8 Gravity 66.4 Splatting 70.3 57% 69.1 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.9% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42 25,948 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (40^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 108 108 20091523 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 1 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 -126495376778210 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3543 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 152 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 128 30 128850985088 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 20091523 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 1 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 20091523 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 20091523 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 11693 (EA) Unknown 0 0 8228 (F1) Unknown 0 0 8228 (F2) Unknown 0 0 12795	66.3% Good	Read 483 Write 141 Mixed 199 60% 274 MB/s	4K Read 27.9 4K Write 92.1 4K Mixed 13.9 109% 44.6 MB/s	DQ Read 187 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 38.2 62% 121 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 66.3% Great: 82%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 874GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 174 173 2275 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 559 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 565 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 207 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 3 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 199 199 3530 (C2) HDA temperature 110 99 33 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 100 31 (F1) Unknown 200 200 164100356 (F2) Unknown 200 200 200518722	95.1% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 167 Mixed 155 122% 162 MB/s	4K Read 1.25 4K Write 2.46 4K Mixed 0.36 138% 1.36 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 109%
Seagate ST3500830AS 500GB-$145 6,517 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 206GB free Firmware: 3.AAD Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 97 92 9765206 (03) Spinup time 93 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 89 89 11426 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 81 49 4445728764 (09) Power-on hours count 74 74 23250 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 90 90 10725 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 59 48 690421801 (C2) HDA temperature 41 52 77309411369 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 63 54 134727471 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	32.9% Below average	Read 60.6 Write 54.1 Mixed 55.6 43% 56.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.25 60% 0.52 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 47,852 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	58.1% Above average	MC Read 21.4 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.5 57% 20 GB/s	SC Read 14.9 SC Write 20.8 SC Mixed 18.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 405 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	64x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	57x
Core i5-6600Intel $132Bench 68%, 80,688 samples	56x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	44x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	27x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	12x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	11x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	24x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 5,347 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $107

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16