Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0 4,842 User benchmarks, average bench 71% CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 91.8 1-Core 87.4 2-Core 175 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 319 8-Core 560 53% 439 Pts	64-Core 849 52% 849 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 77%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 600 15,964 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 0835) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 333.4 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.24% Terrible	Lighting 3.97 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 3.53 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.48 Gravity 4.13 Splatting 2.83 3% 4.15 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.24% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 2TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples

WDC WD12 00VE-00KWT0 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 6830 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.7% Very poor	Read 23.3 Write 24.2 Mixed 25.1 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.31 4K Write 1.31 4K Mixed 0.24 54% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U7BFR8C-PB 4x2GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 4 of 16 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	MC Read 36.1 MC Write 32.6 MC Mixed 28.1 92% 32.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 12.2 SC Mixed 11.5 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 64.5 62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 85%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 19%

Surfboard

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	145x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples	113x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples	87x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	145x
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples	139x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	65x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0-CMA 16x16GBSamsungBench 101%, 41 samples	25x
M391B5173QH0-CMA 8x4GBSamsungBench 84%, 111 samples	19x
M393B1G70QH0-CMA 4x8GBSamsungBench 82%, 512 samples	18x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16