Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	7.09% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	52% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2 (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20090731
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 12:33
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	BIH-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-750-$72 43,796 User benchmarks, average bench 62% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	67.4% Good	Memory 91.9 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 138 63% 102 Pts	4-Core 249 8-Core 254 34% 252 Pts	64-Core 252 16% 252 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.4% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GT 19,550 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Gigabyte(1458 34AF) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	7.09% Terrible	Lighting 9.6 Reflection 9.73 Parallax 3.38 8% 7.57 fps	MRender 7.29 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 6.22 6% 7.03 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 7.09% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 240GB-$193 27,826 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 141GB free (System drive) Firmware: 605ABBF2 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 16843470 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 -43087111906563 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 589 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 43 (B1) Unknown 0 0 1 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 32 41 60132229152 (C2) HDA temperature 32 41 60132229152 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 16843470 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 16843470 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 16843470 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 98 98 94489280513 (E9) Unknown 0 0 13349 (EA) Unknown 0 0 12735 (F1) Unknown 0 0 12735 (F2) Unknown 0 0 10557 (F4) Unknown 99 99 3604531	52% Above average	Read 248 Write 221 Mixed 238 52% 235 MB/s	4K Read 14.8 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 18.5 73% 28.2 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 52.8 64% 112 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 84%
Hitachi HDS722525VLSA80 250GB 513 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 173GB free Firmware: V36OA6MA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 100 100 0 (03) Spinup time 122 122 30083055910 (04) Start/Stop count 93 93 30438 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 93 93 55853 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 4704 (C0) Power-off retract count 73 73 32954 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 73 73 32954 (C2) HDA temperature 157 157 236223922211 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 1 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	30.5% Below average	Read 53.7 Write 52.4 Mixed 29.1 33% 45.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.51 4K Write 1.63 4K Mixed 0.34 89% 0.82 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 30.5% Great: 32%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 76GB free Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 22668 (03) Spinup time 140 138 3991 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6536 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 48 48 38292 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3166 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 220 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 198 198 6316 (C2) HDA temperature 107 94 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	71.3% Very good	Read 136 Write 113 Mixed 117 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.56 4K Write 1.75 4K Mixed 0.34 94% 0.89 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	37.1% Below average	MC Read 14 MC Write 11.7 MC Mixed 11.5 35% 12.4 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.7 SC Mixed 9.8 27% 9.33 GB/s	Latency 64.2 62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55M-UD2 Builds (Compare 313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 20%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55M-UD2

CPU
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	137x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	72x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	33x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	21x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	15x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	15x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	9x

RAM
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	69x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	63x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	39x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $231

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16