MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 15% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	22.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	MSI MS-7788
Motherboard	MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) (all builds)
Memory	6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20130110
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 12:16
Run Duration	286 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 86.9 2-Core 170 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 334 8-Core 330 44% 332 Pts	64-Core 337 21% 337 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174 49,592 User benchmarks, average bench 19% MSI(1462 2733) 1GB CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 17.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	22.4% Poor	Lighting 27 Reflection 28.7 Parallax 32.3 22% 29.3 fps	MRender 25.8 Gravity 21.6 Splatting 34.4 23% 27.3 fps
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 120GB-$70 6,931 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 703 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1171 (A0) Unknown 100 100 0 (A1) Unknown 100 100 105 (A3) Unknown 100 100 23 (A4) Unknown 100 100 60062 (A5) Unknown 100 100 113 (A6) Unknown 100 100 13 (A7) Unknown 100 100 57 (A8) Unknown 100 100 2000 (A9) Unknown 100 100 100 (AF) Unknown 100 100 0 (B0) Unknown 100 100 0 (B1) Unknown 100 100 12 (B2) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 131 (C2) HDA temperature 100 100 29 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 100 100 50082 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 2 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (F1) Unknown 100 100 120182 (F2) Unknown 100 100 144206 (F5) Unknown 100 100 240248	66.6% Good	Read 269 Write 184 Mixed 219 50% 224 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 68.1 4K Mixed 31.9 119% 42.6 MB/s	DQ Read 177 DQ Write 182 DQ Mixed 67.2 81% 142 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 66.6% Great: 89%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 401GB free Firmware: JP2O Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 96 (03) Spinup time 117 117 12897681603 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 2916 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 5 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 138 138 31 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 13752 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 2484 (C0) Power-off retract count 98 98 2941 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 98 98 2941 (C2) HDA temperature 222 222 214748561435 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 5 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	70.2% Very good	Read 122 Write 123 Mixed 116 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.69 4K Write 1.48 4K Mixed 0.38 99% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 74%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 14,254 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	7.69% Terrible	Read 21.6 Write 6.59 Mixed 9.13 13% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.54 4K Write 0.59 4K Mixed 0.5 58% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 7.69% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5471-030.A00LF 1x8GB 790 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.7 MC Mixed 9 27% 9.53 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 9.6 SC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.23 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 30%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 1,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P20 (G3) (MS-7788) - $250

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	176x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	110x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	104x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	206x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	96x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	63x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	61x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	22x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	39x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	24x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $337

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16