PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 2.15% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 6400
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
|
36.6%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce GT 520
Gigabyte(1458 352E) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 267.42
|
2.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
|
29%
Poor
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Facet 8GB
2GB free, PID 5576
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
7.79%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x0.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
1GB DIMM
|
14.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds