Asrock 970M Pro3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 28% Raft	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock 970M Pro3 (all builds)
Memory	14.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160617
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 21 '17 at 03:42
Run Duration	403 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	25%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	63.3% Good	Memory 83.8 1-Core 66.9 2-Core 129 58% 93.2 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 361 37% 297 Pts	64-Core 365 23% 365 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 63.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399 68,699 User benchmarks, average bench 46% AMD(1002 0B00) ≥ 4GB CLim: 947 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 17.7.1 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	47.4% Average	Lighting 58.5 Reflection 55.7 Parallax 59.8 48% 58 fps	MRender 54.8 Gravity 47.2 Splatting 65.8 47% 56 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 47.4% Great: 50%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42 87,912 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 107 100 5483 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 166 (A6) Unknown 100 100 4859 (A7) Unknown 100 100 0 (A8) Unknown 100 100 4914 (A9) Unknown 100 100 50 (AA) Unknown 100 100 0 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4874 (AE) Unknown 100 100 96 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 60 100 223338299432 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 163 (E8) Unknown 100 100 100 (E9) Unknown 100 100 418108 (F1) Unknown 253 253 11565 (F2) Unknown 253 253 4565
Poor: 35% Great: 78%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 7.5TB free Firmware: 9401 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	17.9% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 28.1 Mixed 27.7 22% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.58 4K Write 3.69 4K Mixed 0.48 188% 1.92 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 17.9% Great: 94%
WD Blue 2.5" 640GB (2009)-$152 5,563 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 596GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 196 196 18868 (03) Spinup time 185 183 1716 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4778 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 86 86 10370 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2523 (C0) Power-off retract count 197 197 2379 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 78 78 367832 (C2) HDA temperature 111 98 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 194 194 667 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0
Poor: 12% Great: 47%
Seagate ST3500630AS 500GB-$102 29,256 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 460GB free Firmware: 3.CHN Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 253 0 (03) Spinup time 98 92 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6624 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 89 60 829158038 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 39020 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 3054 (B8) Unknown 100 253 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 52 39 808255536 (C2) HDA temperature 48 61 55834574896 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 65 56 106882768 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	45% Average	Read 74.7 Write 81.9 Mixed 71.7 57% 76.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.71 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.43 109% 0.95 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 43%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59 47,815 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 338GB free Firmware: JP2OA25C Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (02) Throughput performance 135 135 99 (03) Spinup time 121 121 12897550522 (04) Start/Stop count 99 99 6335 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 100 0 (08) Seek timer performance 136 136 32 (09) Power-on hours count 94 94 46753 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 1783 (C0) Power-off retract count 94 94 7308 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 94 94 7308 (C2) HDA temperature 136 136 266288627756 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1	62.8% Good	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 110 83% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.44 4K Write 0.67 4K Mixed 0.13 45% 0.41 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 62.8% Great: 74%
Seagate Desktop HDD 1TB (2013) 2,070 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 261GB free Firmware: CC92 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 120318670 (03) Spinup time 95 94 0 (04) Start/Stop count 87 87 14157 (05) Reallocated sector count 99 99 115 (07) Seek error rate 63 60 2016041 (09) Power-on hours count 91 91 8488 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 173 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 1 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 55 38 400189751341 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 0 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 81 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 97 97 7112 (C2) HDA temperature 45 62 94489280557 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 117 99 120318670 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -107185203830528 (F1) Unknown 100 253 2056556514 (F2) Unknown 100 253 3583409115	49.9% Average	Read 89.3 Write 84.5 Mixed 83.6 65% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.45 92% 0.71 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 71%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2011)-$75 18,569 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 90GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 187 179 1608 (04) Start/Stop count 97 97 3685 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 57 57 31564 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 1242 (BF) G-sense error rate 88 88 12 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 368 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 64 64 410384 (C2) HDA temperature 111 100 36 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (F0) Head flying hours 86 86 10239 (F1) Unknown 200 200 25606634465 (F2) Unknown 200 200 42869072523 (FE) Unknown 200 200 0	44.7% Average	Read 81 Write 74.5 Mixed 65.5 55% 73.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.24 71% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.7% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 20GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz 4096, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	20.8% Poor	MC Read 6.3 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 5.9 18% 6.17 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 5.7 17% 6 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 49%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 970M Pro3 Builds (Compare 843 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 970M Pro3

CPU
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	289x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	228x
FX-8320AMD $175Bench 59%, 106,454 samples	70x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	92x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	51x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	47x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	18x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x

RAM
TEAMGROUP-UD3-1600 2x8GBUnknownBench 52%, 6,864 samples	35x
NMUD380D81-1600C 1x8GBUnknownBench 28%, 485 samples	26x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 80% - Very good

Total price: $217

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16