Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 90% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 91% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	127% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	60.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151028
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 20 '17 at 16:51
Run Duration	272 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120 172,887 User benchmarks, average bench 74% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	86.1% Excellent	Memory 95.5 1-Core 116 2-Core 233 85% 148 Pts	4-Core 414 8-Core 634 65% 524 Pts	64-Core 635 39% 635 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 86.1% Great: 84%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 85EB) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 387.92 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	127% Outstanding	Lighting 175 Reflection 197 Parallax 193 142% 188 fps	MRender 128 Gravity 171 Splatting 126 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 127% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 394GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 9529 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 212 (B1) Unknown 99 99 5 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 75 37 25 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 99 99 2 (EB) Unknown 99 99 33 (F1) Unknown 99 99 6178413174	99.2% Outstanding	Read 519 Write 415 Mixed 423 101% 452 MB/s	4K Read 47.8 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 30.3 168% 61.7 MB/s	DQ Read 50.1 DQ Write 119 DQ Mixed 115 79% 94.8 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 99.2% Great: 134%
SanDisk Extreme 480GB-$300 1,286 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 392GB free (System drive) Firmware: R211 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 105 105 10187295 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 69595650064960 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 9 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 237 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 22 56 21478506518 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 10187295 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 10187295 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 10187295 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 2472 (EA) Unknown 0 0 2259 (F1) Unknown 0 0 2259 (F2) Unknown 0 0 2716	60.1% Good	Read 518 Write 210 Mixed 317 76% 348 MB/s	4K Read 33.2 4K Write 22 4K Mixed 18.1 85% 24.4 MB/s	DQ Read 33.8 DQ Write 22.2 DQ Mixed 13.8 14% 23.3 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 66%
Samsung 840 Evo 500GB-$150 68,337 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 375GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 99 1 6 (09) Power-on hours count 95 95 25038 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 381 (B1) Unknown 94 94 72 (B3) Unknown 99 1 6 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 99 1 6 (BB) vendor-specific 99 99 57 (BE) vendor-specific 77 37 23 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 199 199 57 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 113 (F1) Unknown 99 99 85106350591	79.4% Very good	Read 504 Write 165 Mixed 355 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 46.1 4K Write 83.5 4K Mixed 24.8 146% 51.5 MB/s	DQ Read 48.2 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 24.3 55% 107 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 126%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 829GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 115 109 7241 (04) Start/Stop count 73 73 27423 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 25 25 55320 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 111 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 57 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 79 79 365626 (C2) HDA temperature 123 94 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	53.6% Above average	Read 96.2 Write 90.6 Mixed 82.2 67% 89.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.83 4K Mixed 0.26 80% 0.84 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 57%
Seagate ST31000340AS 1TB-$136 7,908 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 433GB free Firmware: SD15 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 117 99 165045320 (03) Spinup time 92 84 0 (04) Start/Stop count 94 94 6680 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 2 (07) Seek error rate 64 55 116028562390 (09) Power-on hours count 56 56 39162 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 8 (0C) Power cycle count 99 37 1658 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 95 38655361204 (BD) vendor-specific 78 78 22 (BE) vendor-specific 74 35 -3857580006 (C2) HDA temperature 26 65 38654705690 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 24 19 165045320 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0	53.7% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 93.7 Mixed 93.2 70% 93.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.72 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.36 97% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 53.7% Great: 59%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 117 Write 14.3 Mixed 13.7 41% 48.3 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 0.008 4K Mixed 0.006 71% 6.33 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB 2,600 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.1% Very good	MC Read 25 MC Write 26.3 MC Mixed 22.4 70% 24.6 GB/s	SC Read 19.9 SC Write 22.1 SC Mixed 23.2 62% 21.7 GB/s	Latency 55.7 72% 55.7 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 74%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,773 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,617x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	442x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	222x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	403x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	227x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	105x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16